This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience, improve site performance, and gather analytics. By selecting 'Accept,' you consent to these cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.

Comparison Between the Oro-Helical Length Technique and the 7-8-9 Rule in Determination of the Ideal Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates

Sponsored by Ain Shams University

About this trial

Last updated 5 years ago

Study ID

Maha Abdel-Raouf master thesis

Status

Unknown status

Type

Interventional

Phase

N/A

Placebo

No

Accepting

18-75 Years
1 to 28 Years
All
All

Not accepting

Not accepting
Healthy Volunteers

Trial Timing

Ended 5 years ago

What is this trial about?

This study was conducted on neonates needing intubation; Group A,: the ETT insertion depth was estimated according to the OHL method. Group B,: the ETT insertion depth was estimated according to the 7-8-9 method.

What are the participation requirements?

Yes

Inclusion Criteria

- • Full term and preterm neonates who were admitted to NICU and needing endotracheal intubation for invasive mechanical ventilation or administration of surfactant.

- Delivery room intubations were not included as infants are not routinely weighed prior to resuscitation at our hospital. However, infants intubated in the delivery room who were subsequently intubated in the NICU were eligible for inclusion in our study.
No

Exclusion Criteria

- 1. Major upper or lower airway anomalies. 2. Infants with craniofacial, vertebral anomalies. 3. Significant congenital anomalies including cardiac, abdominal or respiratory.

4. Neonates those whose parents declined consent were excluded from the study.

Locations

Location

Status

Recruiting